Integrated Urban Modelling – Space Syntax’s approach
I’ve written before about the benefits of using science-based models in the planning and design process. I’ve raised concerns about the frequent lack of objective analysis in urban and building projects, and the risks this creates in decision-taking. Basing important decisions on gut instinct and experience, then willing on success with little more than hype, just isn’t good enough.
Here is a diagram that summarises Space Syntax’s approach to urban modelling. It’s a staged process: collecting datasets; analysing them to identify relationships between urban form and urban performance; drawing out key issues and developing creative ideas – all the time using the model to test proposals. The approach is transparent and communicative – helping stakeholders participate in the process and, most importantly, helping people take decisions that lead to actions and changed behaviours.
It’s more than a pipedream – we’ve been using the model on projects for over 25 years, evolving it through continuous application. And we’ll continue to do so, adapting to the ever richer data context that digital urbanism provides.
And always remembering that the ultimate objective is the creation of behaviour change to the benefit of human wealth, health and education.
The power of the network 
Hi – within Environment (data inputs) do you also address biodiversity and ecosystem services?
Yes we do – by working with other experts and incorporating their data into our Integrated Urban Model. Thanks for asking – Tim
Pingback: Urban data: some risks – unnecessary complexity and shallow artistry | The power of the network
Pingback: Space Syntax: the push of intent, the pull of need and the resistance of the “pre-digital” | The power of the network